A comical example of an anti-vaccinationist

A few days ago I received this comical comment on my post “This is what happens with the lying anti-vaccination campaigns“. This is a perfect demonstration of what I have been saying all along: that those who promote the anti-vaccination propaganda are usually stupid!

From 2000 to 2006, an estimated 478 million children received measles vaccine through campaigns in 46 out of the 47 priority countries severely affected by the disease.

Here’s your outbreak of measles asshole.[1]
got this from the article YOU posted.

I was vaccinated for measles….and got them! [2]
I was vaccinated for chickenpox…and got those too! [2]
I was vaccinated for the flu…got that a day later. [2]

WAKE UP RETARD! [3] VACCINES ARE A MULTI-BILLION DOLLAR INDUSTRY! GUESS WHO MAKES THE VACCINES. THE SAME PHARMACEUTICAL COMPANIES WHO HAVE SUCCESSFULLY BEEN MEDICATING OUR CHILDREN FOR YEARS! [4]

YOU IGNORANT FOOL. [5] BIG PHARMA NEEDS US TO STAY SICK, SO THEY CAN MASS PRODUCE THEIR DRUGS AND VACCINES…[6] RESEARCH THE FOOD YOU PUT IN YOUR MOUTH EVERYDAY, THE WATER YOU DRINK, THE SHOTS YOU LET DOCTORS GIVE YOUR CHILDREN. ASK YOUR DOCTOR ABOUT THE BONUS HE/SHE GETS FOR VACCINATING A CERTAIN PERCENTAGE OF CHILDREN. [7] ASK WHY THE ADVERSE REACTIONS (DEATH) ARE NEVER MENTIONED!!!! [8]

[numbers are mine and indicate logical fallacies -see below]




This is just delicious! I could have never done a better job at proving how stupid these people can be!

This guy, comically named VACCINATIONABOMINATION, cannot even read an article properly, let alone discuss science or make use of logic. The quote he mentions:

From 2000 to 2006, an estimated 478 million children received measles vaccine through campaigns in 46 out of the 47 priority countries severely affected by the disease.

is from the same article that says in the introduction:

Measles deaths in Africa fell by 91% between 2000 and 2006, figures from the World Health Organization show

Reading. You are doing it wrong!

Then he goes on to demonstrate that he can easily employ a vast array of logical fallacies in only a few small sentences!

  1. ad hominem
  2. argument from personal anecdotes
  3. ad hominem again
  4. argument from conspiracy theories + red herring combo!
  5. ad hominem again
  6. argument from conspiracy theories again
  7. more red herrings
  8. yet another argument from conspiracy theories

Logic. You are also doing it wrong!